|
|
I do not agree with the classification by
previous specialist. I feel that several of the lists types are in fact
identical. However, in 1990, measurements were done by ruler, sometimes
only based on photocopies which definitely will lead to small wrong
measurements. However, until my theory is proven, I will continue with the
previous numbering. Notes on my findings are mentioned in the comment
column.
Notes:
-
Black and White (B/W) images are
images copied from the handbook and are only shown as reference,
neither in actual size, nor are they described.
-
If a link in the colum "Cover Image"
is provided, a fully size high resolution image of the cover bearing
the respective Handstamp. That image will open in a new layer.
-
If you copy the image that has been
scanned from the original cover and open and enlarge it with a
graphic program you will see measuring lines around the handstamp
imprint. These lines indicate the measuring border from which the
actual measurement has been taken.
Handbook Number
|
Image
|
Cover Image
|
Handbook Size
|
Measured size
(from items in my collection)
|
Comment
|
HS-01
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS-02 (1)
|
|
Front
|
47 x 10 mm
|
|
From the late Zvi Alexander collection.
Used by Abdulla Aujan & Brothers,
Bahrain
|
HS-02 (2)
|
|
Front
|
47 x 10 mm
|
|
From the late Zvi Alexander collection.
Used by Abdulla Aujan & Brothers,
Bahrain
|
HS-03
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS-04 (1)
|
|
Front
|
45 x 13 mm
|
45,30 x 13,80 mm
|
On a 1924 Cover from
Baghdad to UK, No senders name. After having seen
the other 2 handstamp below it may well be that this is a
different handstamp and NOT HS-04.
|
HS-04 (2)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
45 x 13 mm
|
44,30 x 14,60 mm
|
Is this the same Handstamp as the one
above? Size and appearance are somehow different.
It seems that the sender Ezra Moshi
Shayaa has also used Route Instruction Handstamp
HS-N57.
|
HS-04 (3)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
45 x 13 mm
|
|
Cover not in my collection, hence
dimensions of the Route Instruction Handstamp can not be
verified.
|
HS-04 (4)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
45 x 13 mm
|
44,90 x 14,40 mm
|
On cover from Baghdad (14 March 1925) to
London, England)
|
HS-05 (1) similar
|
|
Front
|
30 x 9 mm
|
39,25 x 9,50 mm
|
I believe there was a
typing error in the handbook (“0” for “9” in 39). Unfortunately,
only one such hand stamps was known to the author, mine might be
only the second one known, so proving my theory is my next task.
See below, Sender is David Murad Heskel, dated 13. March 1929
|
HS-05 (2) similar
|
|
Front
|
30 x 9 mm
|
38,40 x 8,90 mm
|
Image enhanced due to
week strike. See comment above, sender is David Murad Heskel,
dated 19. January 1930
|
HS-05 (3)
similar
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
30 x 9 mm
|
38,90 x 8,90 mm
|
On Postal Card from Baghdad (Sender
David Heskel Murad) 30 October 1929 to Portugal.
I
still
believe there was a
typing error in the handbook (“0” for “9” in 39). Unfortunately,
only one such hand stamps was known to the author,
this might
be
only the second one known, so proving my theory is my next task.
|
HS-06 (1)
|
|
Front
|
40 x 10 mm
|
40,80 x 11,10 mm
|
On cover front from Iran
|
HS-06 (2)
|
|
Front
|
40 x 10 mm
|
40,00 x 10,70 mm
|
On cover from Iran to
London, England
|
HS-06 (3)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
40 x 10 mm
|
40,40 x 10,70 mm
|
On cover from Iran to
London, England
|
HS-07 (1)
|
|
Front
|
50 x 15 mm
|
48,40 x 15,60 mm
|
Sender Meir Hekel Murad, cover
dated 29. January 1930
|
HS-07 (2)
|
|
Front
|
50 x 15 mm
|
49,20 x 16,10 mm
|
Sender Meir Hekel Murad,
card dated 6. October 1929
|
HS-07 (var)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
50 x 15 mm
|
42,60 x 15,20 mm
|
Sender Meir Hekel Murad,
card dated
27 October 1929
The
Route Instruction Handstamp on this card looks a bit different,
the bottom wavy line seems to be shifted to the left or is
shortened on the right, something i cannot explain how this
happened.
Or is it a new, previously unrecorded, handstamp since the size
differs considerable?
|
HS-08 (1)
|
|
Front
|
59 x 17 mm
|
58,20 x 17,40 mm
|
|
HS-08 (2)
|
|
Front
|
59 x 17 mm
|
56,80 x 17,10 mm
|
Width not possible to
measure
correctly
due to weak handstamp
Sender Orodski-Back
|
HS-08 (3)
|
|
Front
|
59 x 17 mm
|
57,60 x 17,10 mm
|
|
HS-08 (4)
|
|
Front
|
59 x 17 mm
|
58,60 x 17,80 mm
|
Sender Abdeni
|
HS-08 (5)
|
|
Front
|
59 x 17 mm
|
58,10 x 17,30 mm
|
Sender Abdeni
|
HS-08 (6)
|
|
Front
|
59 x 17 mm
|
58,00 x 16,90 mm
|
Sender Abdeni
|
HS-08 (7)
|
|
Front
|
59 x 17 mm
|
58,20 x 17,20 mm
|
Cover sent by G. G. Abdeni, Baghdad, on 20 January 1931 (latest
known date of use of this Route Instruction Handstamp) to
England.
|
HS-08 (8)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
59 x 17 mm
|
57,60 x 17,30 mm
|
Cover sent by Abdullah Y. Ftaya, Baghdad, on
28 February 1924 (earliest
known date of use of this Route Instruction Handstamp) to
Jerusalem / Palestine.
|
HS-09 (1)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
52 x 15 mm
|
|
Cover from the Collection of the late Zvi Alexander.
Collins in is book indicates that this handstamp was used by
Abdallah H. Yehuda Ftaya of Baghdad, the cover however indicates
clearly that the handstamp was (also) used by E.S. SEESNA of Baghdad, a
maker of rubber nand metal stamps and the over was addressed to
Abdallah H. Yehuda Ftaya in Jerusalem and forwarded to his new
address in Baghdad.
|
HS-09 (2)
|
|
Front
|
52 x 15 mm
|
50,80 x 15,70 mm
|
On cover from Baghdad,
dated 16.01.1930 from a different sender as mentioned in Collins
book.
|
HS-10
|
|
Front
|
55 x 12 mm
|
|
|
HS-10 (3)
|
|
Front
|
55 x 12 mm
|
54,3 x 11,6 mm
|
Cover dated 22.1.1930. Sender "The
Imperial Bank of Persia / Baghdad".
|
HS-11 (1)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
52 x 15 mm
|
42,10 x 17,50 mm
|
On Cover
dated 19.12.1930, together with
HS-N36
(1).
Collins must be wrong with his
information on the size.
|
HS-11 (2)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
52 x 15 mm
|
width 42,10 mm
Height not possible to measure as strike
is incomplete
|
On Cover
dated 17.12.1931, together with
HS-N36
(2).
Route Instruction handstamp not complete
|
HS-12 (1)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
48x13 mm
|
48,80 x 14,60 mm
|
On cover from Mahommarah/Iran to
Moulhouse/France, dated 22 February 1926
|
HS-13 (1)
|
|
Front
|
43 x 14 mm
|
|
NOTE: The images in Collins handbook for
HS-12 and HS-13 are identical!! HS-13 does not have a
hyphen "-" between Baghdad and Haifa.
|
HS-13 (2)
|
|
Front
|
43 x 14 mm
|
44,00 x 14,50 mm
|
NOTE: The images in Collins handbook for
HS-12 and HS-13 are identical!! HS-13 does not have a
hyphen "-" between Baghdad and Haifa.
|
HS-14 (1)
|
|
Front
|
|
|
|
HS-14 (2)
|
|
Front
|
56 x 14 mm
|
55,10 x 14,40 mm
|
20 September 1927 from Basrah to England,
new earliest recorded date
|
HS-14 (3)
|
|
Front
|
|
|
December 1929 from Basrah to Rotterdam /
England
|
HS-15 (1)
|
|
Front
|
46 x 9.5 mm
|
46,90 x 9,90 mm
|
|
HS-15 (2)
|
|
Front
|
46 x 9.5 mm
|
46,70 x 9,70 mm
|
|
HS-15 (3)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
46 x 9.5 mm
|
46,70 x 9,80 mm
|
On a registered cover from Baghdad (10
February 1928) via Port Said and England to South Africa,
arrival postmark 13 April 1828. Rare 18 Annas rate.
|
HS-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS-17 (1)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
43,5 x 13 mm
|
43,70 x 13,50 mm
|
Sender address unknown
but cover was sent from Mosul. Color of the cachet is now
confirmed as violet
|
HS-17 (2)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
43,5 x 13 mm
|
|
Height and width not
measurable since upper part is covered by a British "damaged and
sealed label". Cover sent from Eastern Bank LtD, Mosul, dated
09.08.1924, new earliest date.
|
HS-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS-19
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS-20 (1)
|
|
Front
|
68 x 10 mm
|
62,40 x 10,40 mm
|
Cover from R.J.Elowe as mentioned by
Norman Collins but handstamp width is different. Typing error in
the Handbook?
|
HS-20 (2)
|
|
Front
|
68 x 10 mm
|
|
Cover from R.J.Elowe as mentioned by
Norman Collins but handstamp width is different. Typing error in
the Handbook?
|
HS-20 (3)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
68 x 10 mm
|
|
Cover from R.J.Elowe as mentioned by
Norman Collins but handstamp width is different. Typing error in
the Handbook?
Due to double strike, not to measure
correctly.
|
HS-20 (4)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
68 x 10 mm
|
62,90 x 11,30 mm
|
Cover from Basra (3 November 1925),
Sender A.H. Cohen, but handstamp is more or less identical as
the one used by Elowe but this handstamp is in red colour.
Could it be that this handstamps had
been used at the Post Office in Basra?
|
HS-21
|
|
Front
|
73 x 14 mm
|
|
Cover not in my collection, dimension of
the handstamp therefore not possible to verify.
|
HS-21 (2)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
73 x 14 mm
|
|
Cover Ex Collins Archive, dated 22
September 1926 from Basrah to Hamburg Germany.
Sender "Roger Homs / Basrah".
Cover not in my collection, dimension of
the handstamp therefore not possible to verify.
|
HS-21 (3)
|
|
Front
|
73 x 14 mm
|
72,90 x 14,40 mm
|
Sent on 5 May 1925
from Basrah to England.
|
HS-22 (1)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
55 x 13 mm
|
55,5 x 13,1 mm
|
On a 05.08.1925 cover from Port Said /
Egypt to Basrah / Iraq. The second known cover with this
handstamp, the earlier one from the two known.
Sender is "The British Coaling Depot,
Port Said". This cover also carries a
Route Instruction
Label L13
|
HS-22 (2)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
|
56,4 x 14,4 mm
|
On a cover from Port Said, Egypt (20
October 1926) via Baghdad (23 October 1926) to Abadan, Persia.
That cover also carries a Route
Instruction Handstamp
HS-N16 (4)
Difference in size may be explained by
the thick strike of the handstamp.
|
HS-23
|
|
|
|
|
Handstamp is similar to
HS-23,
HS-24,
HS-25,
HS-26,
HS-27,
HS-28,
HS-N10,
HS-N11,
HS-N39.
HS-N41,
HS-N60 and
HS-N63 but the design of the
horizontal ornamental line is always slightly different.
|
HS-24
|
|
|
|
|
Handstamp is similar to
HS-23,
HS-24,
HS-25,
HS-26,
HS-27,
HS-28,
HS-N10,
HS-N11,
HS-N39.
HS-N41,
HS-N60 and
HS-N63 but the design of the
horizontal ornamental line is always slightly different.
|
HS-25 (1)
|
|
Front
|
58 x 15 mm
|
60,20 x 13,00 mm
|
Handstamp is similar to
HS-23,
HS-24,
HS-25,
HS-26,
HS-27,
HS-28,
HS-N10,
HS-N11,
HS-N39.
HS-N41,
HS-N60 and
HS-N63 but the design of the
horizontal ornamental line is always slightly different.
|
HS-25 (2)
|
|
Front
Reverse
|
58 x 15 mm
|
58,70 x 15,80 mm
|
Handstamp is similar to
HS-23,
HS-24,
HS-25,
HS-26,
HS-27,
HS-28,
HS-N10,
HS-N11,
HS-N39.
HS-N41,
HS-N60 and
HS-N63 but the design of the
horizontal ornamental line is always slightly different.
|
|